Finally!
Three years at college with education classes spewing the good graces of NCLB
and at last I find a published someone in the education field who does not see
the value in punishing schools that are struggling. Having to read through text
books devoted to promoting the statutes of NCLB and speaking with various high
school teachers about their experience with having to meet adequate yearly
progress, I’m finally desensitized to the idea that standardization is a good
thing.
What
I’ve noticed that Beers alluded to in her first chapter is that when students
do not find relevance in the curriculum, they separate themselves into an
“underground” realm that places value on their interests. School loses its
legitimacy when the students are not given the primary focus and becomes based
on a series of standards that no one can pinpoint to benefiting the student’s
future.
While
complying with NCLB does promise some good benefits, such as holding every
student to the same standard with necessary concessions made to students with
disabilities, the ideology behind meeting “adequate yearly progress” does not
coincide with a practical use of school materials. What does “adequate yearly
progress” do for employers seeking an innovative worker? Students, contrary to what
some may believe, are not mindless drones. They see when they are being fed
irrelevant information, and react with rebellion (or for those who fear losing
their teacher’s pet status like I was, do nothing but accept the mediocre
garbage that teachers gave in order to justify taking practice standard exams).
In my high school, my class far surpassed the Illinois standards for the ACT,
PSAT and the AP tests and we were given a pizza party. While food does draw
crowds, we all knew that this was provided for us only because we made the
school look good. This is not to diminish the teachers who brought about the
school’s success. In fact, our teachers offered more opportunities to be
expressive in addition to learning the NCLB curriculum. While I only speak from
experience with our school’s English and History departments—I avoided math and
science like the plague due to my inadequacy in calculating the amount of moles
in a chemical equation…not even sure if that’s scientifically correct—each
department was highly praised by parents and, yes, even students.
The
principal is an enthusiastic educator and now works with the school system ten
miles from my hometown that are failing miserably by incorporating more AP classes
into the curriculum. I am hesitant to support his method because the risk that
students who are forced into these classes by demanding colleges and parents
and even peer pressure. This issue is not just about achieving adequate yearly
progress with standardized testing; the gap established between remedial and AP
classes creates a potential sense of
inadequacy into the student mindset. The fear of being thought of as dumb is
just as bad as the fear of not being popular, or even well liked. Many students
in my school were forced by their parents to take these classes in order to
earn college credit without regard for whether or not they were actually ready
for such an advanced curriculum. The ever famous Admiral Ackbar quote “It’s a
trap” comes to mind as students are being enrolled in classes beyond their
current skill level or students who are ready for such a higher skill level are
held back because they do not have the same advantages of the other students.
High school is supposed to prepare students for both adulthood and college, but
instead, the curriculum is creating cookie cutter, take the test and never
remember it afterwards, lacking innovative adults who have not been given a chance
to learn for themselves. With the amount of opportunity students are given in
this age of technological explosion, it is depressing to know that the only
opportunity they have to express themselves comes from outside the curriculum.
Blogging,
while it does have the potential to be an online diary, could potentially be
the best instructional tool an English teacher assigns their class. Allowing
the students to choose their point of interest to write about weekly, whether
it be the environment, an issue being addressed in Congress or a response to a
piece of literature, helps the students’ interests are being acknowledged. Who
knows? They might even learn something about writing and finding credible
information to respond to in addition to writing about what interests them. If
this were done on a secure blogging network that connects nationwide
classrooms, the students could learn about critiquing work. It is the fate of
every internet writer to bash something with a keyboard-shaped club. Take that
brutish tendency and transform it into something constructive!
Ahhh. So glad you're enjoying the candidness of the text. I think it's fair that you're exposed to the debates that are happening out there. If you're interested, and have time (with 19 hours!), I have additional texts you might be interested in that talk in more detail (theoretically) about what you've referred to in your text. I have a feeling you're heading to grad school before too long (:
ReplyDelete